Phase 2 Study of Sorafenib, Valproic Acid, and Sildenafil in the Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma.

Here we report the results of a single-center phase 2 clinical trial combining sorafenib tosylate, valproic acid, and sildenafil for the treatment of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (NCT01817751). Clinical toxicities were grade 1 and grade 2, with one grade 3 toxicity for maculopapular rash (6.4%). For all evaluable patients, the median progression-free survival was 3.65 months and overall survival (OS) 10.0 months. There was promising evidence showing clinical activity and benefit. In the 33 evaluable patients, low protein levels of the chaperone GRP78 (HSPA5) was significantly associated with a better OS (p < 0.0026). A correlation between the expression of PDGFRα and OS approached significance (p < 0.0728). Five patients presently have a mean OS of 73.6 months and remain alive. This is the first therapeutic intervention glioblastoma trial to significantly associate GRP78 expression to OS. Our data suggest that the combination of sorafenib tosylate, valproic acid, and sildenafil requires additional clinical development in the recurrent glioma population.

Targeting of SUMOylation leads to cBAF complex stabilization and disruption of the SS18::SSX transcriptome in Synovial Sarcoma.

Synovial Sarcoma (SS) is driven by the SS18::SSX fusion oncoprotein. and is ultimately refractory to therapeutic approaches. SS18::SSX alters ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling BAF (mammalian SWI/SNF) complexes, leading to the degradation of canonical (cBAF) complex and amplified presence of an SS18::SSX-containing non-canonical BAF (ncBAF or GBAF) that drives an SS-specific transcription program and tumorigenesis. We demonstrate that SS18::SSX activates the SUMOylation program and SSs are sensitive to the small molecule SAE1/2 inhibitor, TAK-981. Mechanistically, TAK-981 de-SUMOylates the cBAF subunit SMARCE1, stabilizing and restoring cBAF on chromatin, shifting away from SS18::SSX-ncBAF-driven transcription, associated with DNA damage and cell death and resulting in tumor inhibition across both human and mouse SS tumor models. TAK-981 synergized with cytotoxic chemotherapy through increased DNA damage, leading to tumor regression. Targeting the SUMOylation pathway in SS restores cBAF complexes and blocks the SS18::SSX-ncBAF transcriptome, identifying a therapeutic vulnerability in SS, positioning the in-clinic TAK-981 to treat SS.

Delayed Postoperative Intracerebral Hemorrhage Associated With Oral Multikinase Inhibitor Therapy for Cancer: A Case Report.

Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF) activity used as an antiangiogenic agent for metastatic colorectal cancer treatment and has been studied as a potential therapeutic agent for several other cancer treatments. Adverse reactions commonly reported with the use of regorafenib and similar oral multikinase inhibitors include hemorrhage, gastrointestinal fistulas, hypertension, and incomplete wound healing. We report a case of a 59-year-old man with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma post-colostomy on regorafenib treatment presenting to the emergency department with altered mental status. MRI showed a left frontoparietal mass, which was resected with a left frontal craniotomy. Postoperative MRI showed a resection cavity without significant hemorrhage. He had been prescribed regorafenib preceding his hospitalization, which was continued after admission before surgery and on postoperative day 1. Thirty-two hours after surgery, the patient exhibited sudden right-sided facial droop and right arm weakness. Imaging revealed an acute intraparenchymal hemorrhage within and adjacent to the tumor resection bed, which was managed conservatively. The patient was subsequently discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. The unusual timing of the hemorrhage suggests that the hemorrhage was due to adverse effects of regorafenib. Patients undergoing neurosurgery should have regorafenib discontinued in preparation for surgery. Similar management should be considered for other anti-VEGF medications to avoid serious complications.

A phase 1 study of regorafenib and sildenafil in adults with advanced solid tumors.

The purpose of this study is to establish the recommended phase 2 dose for regorafenib in combination with sildenafil for patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary outcomes included identification of antitumor effects of regorafenib and sildenafil, toxicity of the combination, determination of PDE5 expression in tumor samples, and the impact of sildenafil on the pharmacokinetics of regorafenib. This study was a phase 1, open-label single-arm dose-escalation trial using a 3 + 3 design. Additional patients were enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) until a total of 12 patients were treated at the MTD. A total of 29 patients were treated in this study. The median duration of treatment was 8 weeks. The recommended phase 2 doses determined in this study are regorafenib 160 mg daily with sildenafil 100 mg daily. The most common toxicities included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (20 patients, 69%) and hypophosphatemia (18 patients, 62%). Two patients (7%) experienced grade 4 lipase increase. Objective responses were not observed; however, 14 patients (48%) had a period of stable disease during the study. Stable disease for up to 12 months was observed in patients with ovarian cancer as well as up to 20 months for a patient with cervical cancer. The combination of regorafenib and sildenafil at the recommended phase 2 dose is safe and generally well tolerated. Disease control in patients with gynecologic malignancies was especially encouraging. Further evaluation of the combination of regorafenib and sildenafil in gynecologic malignancies is warranted. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02466802.

US physician perspective on the use of biomarker and ctDNA testing in patients with melanoma.

New treatments have increased survival of patients with melanoma, and methods to monitor patients throughout the disease process are needed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a predictive and prognostic biomarker that may allow routine, real-time monitoring of disease status. We surveyed 44 US physicians to understand their preferences and practice patterns for biomarker and ctDNA testing in their patients with melanoma. Tumor biomarker testing was often ordered in stage IIIA-IV patients. Barriers to biomarker testing include insufficient tissue (60%) and lack of insurance coverage (54%). ctDNA testing was ordered by 16-18% of physicians for stages II-IV. Reasons for not using ctDNA testing included lack of prospective data (41%), ctDNA testing used for research only (18%), and others. Physicians (≥74%) believed that ctDNA assays could help with monitoring and treatment selection throughout the disease process. Physicians consider ctDNA testing potentially valuable for clinical decision-making but cited concerns that should be addressed.

Autophagy as a therapeutic mechanism to kill drug-resistant cancer cells.

Herein we discuss multiple pre-clinical projects developed by our group that have been translated into patients at Massey Cancer Center. Our work has used multi-kinase inhibitors, for example, sorafenib, regorafenib and neratinib, and combined with additional agents, for example, histone deacetylase inhibitors, the thymidylate synthase inhibitor pemetrexed, and PDE5 inhibitors. In broad-brush terms, our experience has been that these drug combinations enhance signaling by ATM-AMPK-ULK-1 and decrease signaling from growth factor receptors and RAS proteins, thereby lowering the activities of the intracellular signaling kinase ERK1/2, AKT, mTOR and p70 S6K . This collectively results in reduced protein synthesis and the induction of an endoplasmic reticulum stress response alongside autophagosome formation and autophagic flux. The rupture of autolysosomes, releasing proteases such as cathepsin B into the cytosol results in the cleavage and activation of the toxic BH3 domain protein BID which cooperates with BAX, BAK and BIM to cause mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to the release of cytochrome c and AIF, which then execute the tumor cell. For each of our two-drug combinations, we then performed additional laboratory-based studies to define the development of evolutionary resistance mechanisms, with the long-term concept of performing new three-drug clinical trials to prolong therapeutic efficacy and disease control.

Cellular responses after (neratinib plus pemetrexed) exposure in NSCLC cells.

We previously demonstrated that neratinib interacted with pemetrexed to kill non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. From developing other drug combinations, we observed that several days following exposure, cells activated survival mechanisms to counteract drug toxicity. The present studies attempted to define mechanisms that evolve to reduce the efficacy of neratinib and pemetrexed. Neratinib and pemetrexed synergized to kill NSCLC cells expressing wild-type RAS proteins, mutant KRAS (G12S; Q61H; G12A and G12C) or mutant NRAS (Q61K) or mutant ERBB1 (L858R; L858R T790M and exon 19 deletion). Neratinib and pemetrexed interacted in a greater than additive fashion to kill after 24 h, and after a further 24 h culture in the absence of drugs. Mutant KRAS G12V was more cytoprotective than either activated MEK1 or activated AKT. Knockdown of mutant KRAS reduced drug combination killing at the 48 h timepoint. Despite culture for 24 h in the absence of the drugs, the expression and activities of ERBB1, ERBB2 and ERBB4 remained significantly lower as did the activities of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) C1 and mTORC2. The drug combination reduced KRAS and NRAS levels for 24 h, however, in the absence of the drugs, RAS levels had normalized by 48 h. Expression of Beclin1 and ATG5 remained elevated and of MCL1 and BCL-XL lower. No evolutionary activations of survival signaling by ERBB3, c-KIT, c-MET or PDGFRß or in intracellular signaling pathways were observed. These findings argue against the development of 'early' resistance mechanisms after neratinib and pemetrexed exposure. Future studies will be required to understand how NSCLC cells become resistant to neratinib and pemetrexed.

Tumor cell p38 inhibition to overcome immunotherapy resistance.

Patients with tumors that do not respond to immune-checkpoint inhibition often harbor a non-T cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment, characterized by the absence of IFN-γ-associated CD8+ T cell and dendritic cell activation. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying immune exclusion in non-responding patients may enable the development of novel combination therapies. p38 MAPK is a known regulator of dendritic and myeloid cells however a tumor-intrinsic immunomodulatory role has not been previously described. Here we identify tumor cell p38 signaling as a therapeutic target to potentiate anti-tumor immunity and overcome resistance to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Molecular analysis of tumor tissues from patients with human papillomavirus-negative head and neck squamous carcinoma reveals a p38-centered network enriched in non-T cell-inflamed tumors. Pan-cancer single-cell RNA analysis suggests that p38 activation may be an immune-exclusion mechanism across multiple tumor types. P38 knockdown in cancer cell lines increases T cell migration, and p38 inhibition plus ICI in preclinical models shows greater efficacy compared to monotherapies. In a clinical trial of patients refractory to PD1/L1 therapy, pexmetinib, a p38 inhibitor, plus nivolumab demonstrated deep and durable clinical responses. Targeting of p38 with anti-PD1 has the potential to induce the T cell-inflamed phenotype and overcome immunotherapy resistance.

Long-term outcome analysis of Y90 radioembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background: Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization is a catheter-based therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Multiple trials have evaluated the efficacy of Y90 in HCC; however, few have assessed long-term hepatic function. This study aimed to evaluate a clinical real-world experience of Y90 effectiveness and long-term impact on hepatic function. Methods: A single-center retrospective chart review was performed for patients with Child-Pugh (CP) class A or B who received Y90 for primary HCC between 2008 and 2016. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and CP scores were calculated on the day of treatment and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-procedure. Results: Of the 134 patients included, the mean age was 60 years old and median overall survival (OS) from date of diagnosis was 28 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 22.21-38.05]. Patients with CP class A (85%) had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3 months (95% CI: 2.99-5.55) and median OS of 17 months (95% CI: 9.59-23.10) from date of Y90 treatment compared to a median PFS of 4 months (95% CI: 2.07-8.28) and OS of 8 months (95% CI: 4.60-15.64) for patients with CP class B. MELD scores were significantly higher post-treatment than pre-treatment, with significant recovery at 24 months. No significant differences were seen between cancer stage and OS, while PFS and cancer stage did show difference between cancer stage 1 and 3 with longer median PFS seen in stage 1. Conclusions: While our study supports the literature for OS in Y90-treated patients, we found a shorter PFS in this population. This may reflect the differences between the utilization of RECIST in clinical trials and clinical radiology practice in determining progression. Significant factors associated with OS were age, MELD, CP scores and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). For PFS, CP score and stage at diagnosis were significant. Increasing MELD scores over time likely reflected a combination of radioembolization-induced liver disease, liver decompensation or progression of HCC. The downtrend at 24 months is likely due to long term survivors with significant benefit from therapy with no long-term complications from Y90.

Neoadjuvant-Adjuvant or Adjuvant-Only Pembrolizumab in Advanced Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Whether pembrolizumab given both before surgery (neoadjuvant therapy) and after surgery (adjuvant therapy), as compared with pembrolizumab given as adjuvant therapy alone, would increase event-free survival among patients with resectable stage III or IV melanoma is unknown. METHODS: In a phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned patients with clinically detectable, measurable stage IIIB to IVC melanoma that was amenable to surgical resection to three doses of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, surgery, and 15 doses of adjuvant pembrolizumab (neoadjuvant-adjuvant group) or to surgery followed by pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses) for approximately 1 year or until disease recurred or unacceptable toxic effects developed (adjuvant-only group). The primary end point was event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Events were defined as disease progression or toxic effects that precluded surgery; the inability to resect all gross disease; disease progression, surgical complications, or toxic effects of treatment that precluded the initiation of adjuvant therapy within 84 days after surgery; recurrence of melanoma after surgery; or death from any cause. Safety was also evaluated. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, the neoadjuvant-adjuvant group (154 patients) had significantly longer event-free survival than the adjuvant-only group (159 patients) (P = 0.004 by the log-rank test). In a landmark analysis, event-free survival at 2 years was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64 to 80) in the neoadjuvant-adjuvant group and 49% (95% CI, 41 to 59) in the adjuvant-only group. The percentage of patients with treatment-related adverse events of grades 3 or higher during therapy was 12% in the neoadjuvant-adjuvant group and 14% in the adjuvant-only group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with resectable stage III or IV melanoma, event-free survival was significantly longer among those who received pembrolizumab both before and after surgery than among those who received adjuvant pembrolizumab alone. No new toxic effects were identified. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Merck Sharp and Dohme; S1801 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03698019.).

AR12 increases BAG3 expression which is essential for Tau and APP degradation via LC3-associated phagocytosis and macroautophagy.

We defined the mechanisms by which the chaperone ATPase inhibitor AR12 and the multi-kinase inhibitor neratinib interacted to reduce expression of Tau and amyloid-precursor protein (APP) in microglia and neuronal cells. AR12 and neratinib interacted to increase the phosphorylation of eIF2A S51 and the expression of BAG3, Beclin1 and ATG5, and in parallel, enhanced autophagosome formation and autophagic flux. Knock down of BAG3, Beclin1 or ATG5 abolished autophagosome formation and significantly reduced degradation of p62, LAMP2, Tau, APP, and GRP78 (total and plasma membrane). Knock down of Rubicon, a key component of LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP), significantly reduced autophagosome formation but not autophagic flux and prevented degradation of Tau, APP, and cell surface GRP78, but not ER-localized GRP78. Knock down of Beclin1, ATG5 or Rubicon or over-expression of GRP78 prevented the significant increase in eIF2A phosphorylation. Knock down of eIF2A prevented the increase in BAG3 expression and significantly reduced autophagosome formation, autophagic flux, and it prevented Tau and APP degradation. We conclude that AR12 has the potential to reduce Tau and APP levels in neurons and microglia via the actions of LAP, endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling and macroautophagy. We hypothesize that the initial inactivation of GRP78 catalytic function by AR12 facilitates an initial increase in eIF2A phosphorylation which in turn is essential for greater levels of eIF2A phosphorylation, greater levels of BAG3 and macroautophagy and eventually leading to significant amounts of APP/Tau degradation.

BESPOKE IO protocol: a multicentre, prospective observational study evaluating the utility of ctDNA in guiding immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy (IO) has transformed the treatment paradigm for a wide variety of solid tumours. However, assessment of response can be challenging with conventional radiological imaging (eg, iRECIST), which do not precisely capture the unique response patterns of tumours treated with IO. Emerging data suggest that circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can aid in response assessment in patients with solid tumours receiving IO. The short half-life of ctDNA puts it in a unique position for early treatment response monitoring. The BESPOKE IO study is designed to investigate the clinical utility of serial ctDNA testing to assess treatment response using a tumour-informed, bespoke ctDNA assay (Signatera) and to determine its impact on clinical decision-making with respect to continuation/discontinuation, or escalation/de-escalation of immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The BESPOKE IO is a multicentre, prospective, observational study with a goal to enroll over 1500 patients with solid tumours receiving IO in up to 100 US sites. Patients will be followed for up to 2 years with serial ctDNA analysis, timed with every other treatment cycle. The primary endpoint is to determine the percentage of patients who will have their treatment regimen changed as guided by post-treatment bespoke ctDNA results along with standard response assessment tools. The major secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival and overall response rate based on the ctDNA dynamics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The BESPOKE IO study was approved by the WCG Institutional Review Board (Natera-20-043-NCP BESPOKE Study of ctDNA Guided Immunotherapy (BESPOKE IO)) on 22 February 2021. Data protection and privacy regulations will be strictly observed in the capturing, forwarding, processing and storing patients' data. Natera will approve the publication of any study results in accordance with the site-specific contract. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04761783.

Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE-716): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab prolongs progression-free and overall survival among patients with advanced melanoma and recurrence-free survival in resected stage III disease. KEYNOTE-716 assessed pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected, high-risk, stage II melanoma. We report results from the planned first and second interim analyses for recurrence-free survival. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, involving 160 academic medical centres and hospitals in 16 countries (Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA), patients aged 12 years or older with newly diagnosed, completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (TNM stage T3b or T4 with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy) were recruited. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1), in blocks of four and stratified by T-category (3b, 4a, and 4b) and paediatric status (age 12-17 years vs ≥18 years), using an interactive response technology system to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg (2 mg/kg in paediatric patients) or placebo every 3 weeks for 17 cycles or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. All patients, clinical investigators, and analysts were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed recurrence-free survival (defined as time from randomisation to recurrence or death) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment). The primary endpoint was met if recurrence-free survival was significantly improved for pembrolizumab versus placebo at either the first interim analysis (after approximately 128 patients had events) or second interim analysis (after 179 patients had events) under multiplicity control. Safety was assessed in all patients randomly assigned to treatment who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03553836, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Sept 23, 2018, and Nov 4, 2020, 1182 patients were screened, of whom 976 were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n=487) or placebo (n=489; ITT population). The median age was 61 years (IQR 52-69) and 387 (40%) patients were female and 589 (60%) were male. 874 (90%) of 976 patients were White and 799 (82%) were not Hispanic or Latino. 483 (99%) of 487 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 486 (99%) of 489 in the placebo group received assigned treatment. At the first interim analysis (data cutoff on Dec 4, 2020; median follow-up of 14·4 months [IQR 10·2-18·7] in the pembrolizumab group and 14·3 months [10·1-18·7] in the placebo group), 54 (11%) of 487 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 82 (17%) of 489 in the placebo group had a first recurrence of disease or died (hazard ratio [HR] 0·65 [95% CI 0·46-0·92]; p=0·0066). At the second interim analysis (data cutoff on June 21, 2021; median follow-up of 20·9 months [16·7-25·3] in the pembrolizumab group and 20·9 months [16·6-25·3] in the placebo group), 72 (15%) patients in the pembrolizumab group and 115 (24%) in the placebo group had a first recurrence or died (HR 0·61 [95% CI 0·45-0·82]). Median recurrence-free survival was not reached in either group at either assessment timepoint. At the first interim analysis, grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 78 (16%) of 483 patients in the pembrolizumab groups versus 21 (4%) of 486 in the placebo group. At the first interim analysis, four patients died from an adverse event, all in the placebo group (one each due to pneumonia, COVID-19-related pneumonia, suicide, and recurrent cancer), and at the second interim analysis, one additional patient, who was in the pembrolizumab group, died from an adverse event (COVID-19-related pneumonia). No deaths due to study treatment occurred. INTERPRETATION: Pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy for up to approximately 1 year for stage IIB or IIC melanoma resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of disease recurrence or death versus placebo, with a manageable safety profile. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

The Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Monitoring in Cancer Patients Who Are Pregnant or Planning to Become Pregnant.

The number of pregnant women with cancer is on the rise. These patients and their providers encounter complex medical management decisions. Standard-of-care systemic therapy and radiological imaging can impair fetal development and affect viability. Conversely, insufficient monitoring and treatment can lead to cancer progression, compromising the health of the patient. Personalized and tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing (Signatera™, bespoke mPCR NGS assay) is a validated, noninvasive blood test that can accurately assess cancer progression and tumor response to treatment ahead of radiological imaging, across solid tumors. In this case series of four patients, we explore the clinical utility of longitudinal ctDNA testing in the medical management of pregnant patients with solid tumors, to aid in informed decision-making for patients and providers.

Neratinib kills B-RAF V600E melanoma via ROS-dependent autophagosome formation and death receptor signaling.

Melanoma cells expressing mutant B-RAF V600E are susceptible to treatment with the combination of a B-RAF inhibitor and a MEK1/2 inhibitor. We investigated the impact of the ERBB family and MAP4K inhibitor neratinib on the biology of PDX isolates of cutaneous melanoma expressing B-RAF V600E. Neratinib synergized with HDAC inhibitors to kill melanoma cells at their physiologic concentrations. Neratinib activated ATM, AMPK, ULK1, and PERK and inactivated mTORC1/2, ERK1/2, eIF2 alpha, and STAT3. Neratinib increased expression of Beclin1, ATG5, CD95, and FAS-L and decreased levels of multiple toxic BH3 domain proteins, MCL1, BCL-XL, FLIP-s, and ERBB1/2/4. ATG13 S318 phosphorylation and autophagosome formation was dependent upon ATM, and activation of ATM was dependent on reactive oxygen species. Reduced expression of ERBB1/2/4 required autophagosome formation and reduced MCL1/BCL-XL levels required eIF2 alpha phosphorylation. Maximal levels of eIF2 alpha phosphorylation required signaling by ATM-AMPK and autophagosome formation. Knock down of eIF2 alpha, CD95, FAS-L, Beclin1, and ATG5 or over-expression of FLIP-s significantly reduced killing. Combined knock down of Beclin1 and CD95 abolished cell death. Our data demonstrate that PDX melanoma cells expressing B-RAF V600E are susceptible to being killed by neratinib and more so when combined with HDACi.

Multicenter randomized phase II trial of atezolizumab with or without cobimetinib in biliary tract cancers.

BACKGROUNDMEK inhibitors have limited activity in biliary tract cancers (BTCs) as monotherapy but are hypothesized to enhance responses to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition.METHODSThis open-label phase II study randomized patients with BTC to atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) as monotherapy or in combination with cobimetinib (MEK inhibitor). Eligible patients had unresectable BTC with 1 to 2 lines of prior therapy in the metastatic setting, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to 1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).RESULTSSeventy-seven patients were randomized and received study therapy. The trial met its primary endpoint, with a median PFS of 3.65 months in the combination arm versus 1.87 months in the monotherapy arm (HR 0.58, 90% CI 0.35-0.93, 1-tail P = 0.027). One patient in the combination arm (3.3%) and 1 patient in the monotherapy arm (2.8%) had a partial response. Combination therapy was associated with more rash, gastrointestinal events, CPK elevations, and thrombocytopenia. Exploratory analysis of tumor biopsies revealed enhanced expression of antigen processing and presentation genes and an increase in CD8/FoxP3 ratios with combination treatment. Patients with higher baseline or lower fold changes in expression of certain inhibitory ligands (LAG3, BTLA, VISTA) on circulating T cells had evidence of greater clinical benefit from the combination.CONCLUSIONThe combination of atezolizumab plus cobimetinib prolonged PFS as compared with atezolizumab monotherapy, but the low response rate in both arms highlights the immune-resistant nature of BTCs.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03201458.FUNDINGNational Cancer Institute (NCI) Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN); F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.; NCI, NIH (R01 CA228414-01 and UM1CA186691); NCI's Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Gastrointestinal Cancers (P50 CA062924); NIH Center Core Grant (P30 CA006973); and the Passano Foundation.

Axitinib and HDAC Inhibitors Interact to Kill Sarcoma Cells.

We have extended our analyses of HDAC inhibitor biology in sarcoma. The multi-kinase inhibitor axitinib interacted with multiple HDAC inhibitors to kill sarcoma cells. Axitinib and HDAC inhibitors interacted in a greater than additive fashion to inactivate AKT, mTORC1 and mTORC2, and to increase Raptor S722/S792 phosphorylation. Individually, all drugs increased phosphorylation of ATM S1981, AMPKα T172, ULK1 S317 and ATG13 S318 and reduced ULK1 S757 phosphorylation; this correlated with enhanced autophagic flux. Increased phosphorylation of ULK1 S317 and of Raptor S722/S792 required ATM-AMPK signaling. ULK1 S757 is a recognized site for mTORC1 and knock down of either ATM or AMPKα reduced the drug-induced dephosphorylation of this site. Combined exposure of cells to axitinib and an HDAC inhibitor significantly reduced the expression of HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, HDAC4, HDAC6 and HDAC7. No response was observed for HDACs 10 and 11. Knock down of ULK1, Beclin1 or ATG5 prevented the decline in HDAC expression, as did expression of a constitutively active mTOR protein. Axitinib combined with HDAC inhibitors enhanced expression of Class I MHCA and reduced expression of PD-L1 which was recapitulated via knock down studies, particularly of HDACs 1 and 3. In vivo, axitinib and the HDAC inhibitor entinostat interacted to significantly reduce tumor growth. Collectively our findings support the exploration of axitinib and HDAC inhibitors being developed as a novel sarcoma therapy.